Neurology - 2

neurology 

basic neuroscience and clinical neurology ranked at the top of the list for difficulty in learning and complexi

   I believe this kind of fundamental reciprocal relationship is fundamentally in order to understand the mind. I would say that consciousness depends on it.

 I wouldn't say that consciousness is identical to it or reducible to it. That would be different kinds of thinking.

 So this kind of reciprocal model of function can be described at several different levels of description and my model begins with the surface manifestation level

 if you order the level of the mind rather than from your all components simply because it's a possibility that the mind can be realized in a number of different ways that is different strategies that the brain is able to employ. 

And those strategies should be thought of as a kind of orchestration of very simple functions of elementary functions in the brain

 that are truly localized they are orchestrated in global on large scale networks perhaps as strategies in order to realize this kind of this kind of manifestation level..

 And every time we succeed in doing something or even perceive something these networks are elementary functions will be strengthened.

 Now should an injury occur to an elementary function a different kind of strategy which may be markedly different which may be less effective or less effective seem able to take over this realization and this can only be possible due to a constant reorganization of the level of elementary functions.

very important 

 So please note that this idea involves a very important change of perspectives.

 The upper level here seems to reorganize the lower level of description that is cognition alters brain architecture.

 You might say that you need to understand the mind in order to be able to understand the brain in this way.

 I would argue that the brain constantly optimizes its own functions given resource limitations not by analyzing lots of data but by back propagation from action and cognition.

 So in this way a function can be the same and different before and after a brain injury dependent on the level of description.

And in my model the upper level or the surface level seems to have two aspects of functional one and the subjectively conscious one and neither can be reduced to the other set before

. And if that is right then neuroscience can never completely explain consciousness.

 However the relation between the two can be understood and described. So it is probably some time that we discuss what we can do and what we should not do once we have this knowledge. 

Therefore my question to you is also how we might apply insights into consciousness for various clinical and practical purposes.