Neurology

Neurology

 It is So consciousness is a complete mystery to neuroscience

 why we subjectively experience anything like the feeling of pain or the retinas of red.

 Whenever there are certain kinds of activation in the brain as a problem

 we don't even know how to think about yet current large scale brain initiatives.

 Tell us a lot about the brain but seems so far unable to make progress in this matter.

 It is as if knowledge of the brain does not include knowledge of the mind. 

So even if we knew every cell in every single brain process

we would still not suddenly discover consciousness as a physical object inside the brain.

 Neuroscience today typically offers you one of two kinds of explanations for almost all kinds of questions. 

Some seem to prefer to try and explain mental phenomena based on physical localization in the brain while others prefer connections models inspired by the way computers work. 

But neither seems really able to bridge this kind of mind-brain gap. Surprisingly none of those two models are very good at understanding brain injury either. 

It's still a paradox the connection is models. Why localization of injury seems so important. 

Yet it's a paradox to localization ist models. 

How functions can be lost and recovered without regrowth of the same lost tissue 

now, of course, any kind of theory of the brain able to handle and support an understanding of complex matters such a subjective experience on your rehabilitation 

will be it will be of great value to many different disciplines and may revolutionize artificial intelligence and robotics and possibly also ethics.

 As mentioned a moment ago. 

So if our current models of the brain find consciousness to be this big mystery. 

And if we can't really guide clinical neurorehabilitation either then we probably need completely new models and those should probably not be extensions of the traditional ones but rather tried to do something completely new.

 So let us begin with some simple observations introspective Lee.

 It appears that everything that we experience is information that we have access to it is somehow available for flexible actions. 

You might not act on it but it is available to you. 

Just look for yourself. 

Everything that you experience is something that you can act on or report or talk about. 

Now the brain, however, doesn't seem to perceive the world directly as it is perceived to come up with the best reason, of course,

 the way it does in its own current state believe that this kind of process makes information available to us and that the outcome of that sea action outcome in return modifies this analysis of causation through back provocations.